Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 86.411
Filter
1.
Mediators Inflamm ; 2024: 4465592, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707705

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact and predictive value of the preoperative NPRI on short-term complications and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery for colorectal cCancer (CRC). Methods: A total of 302 eligible CRC patients were included, assessing five inflammation-and nutrition-related markers and various clinical features for their predictive impact on postoperative outcomes. Emphasis was on the novel indicator NPRI to elucidate its prognostic and predictive value for perioperative risks. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a history of abdominal surgery, prolonged surgical duration, CEA levels ≥5 ng/mL, and NPRI ≥ 3.94 × 10-2 as independent risk factors for postoperative complications in CRC patients. The Clavien--Dindo complication grading system highlighted the close association between preoperative NPRI and both common and severe complications. Multivariate analysis also identified a history of abdominal surgery, tumor diameter ≥5 cm, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated tumors, and NPRI ≥ 2.87 × 10-2 as independent risk factors for shortened overall survival (OS). Additionally, a history of abdominal surgery, tumor maximum diameter ≥5 cm, tumor differentiation as poor/undifferentiated, NPRI ≥ 2.87 × 10-2, and TNM Stage III were determined as independent risk factors for shortened disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curve results showed significantly higher 5-year OS and DFS in the low NPRI group compared to the high NPRI group. The incorporation of NPRI into nomograms for OS and DFS, validated through calibration and decision curve analyses, attested to the excellent accuracy and practicality of these models. Conclusion: Preoperative NPRI independently predicts short-term complications and long-term prognosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, enhancing predictive accuracy when incorporated into nomograms for patient survival.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Neutrophils , Postoperative Complications , Prealbumin , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Prealbumin/metabolism , Risk Factors , Disease-Free Survival , Adult , Multivariate Analysis , Logistic Models
3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 585, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741038

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing for surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma appears to be a topic of limited data. Many clinical studies lack stringent guidelines regarding this timing. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery on survival outcomes in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 2019 and October 2022 at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment interval: ≤33 days and > 33 days. The primary observational endpoints of the study were Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary observational endpoints included Objective response rate (ORR), Major Pathological Response (MPR), and Pathological Complete Remission (pCR). RESULTS: Using the Kaplan-Meier methods, the ≤ 33d group demonstrated a superior DFS curve compared to the > 33d group (p = 0.0015). The median DFS for the two groups was 952 days and 590 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the OS curves between the groups (p = 0.66), and the median OS was not reached for either group. The treatment interval did not influence the pathologic response of the tumor or lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The study observed that shorter treatment intervals were associated with improved DFS, without influencing OS, pathologic response, or surgical safety. Patients should avoid having a prolonged treatment interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Lung Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Male , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Female , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Pneumonectomy , Time-to-Treatment , Adult , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(9)2024 Apr 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731979

ABSTRACT

HHLA2 is a checkpoint from the B7 family that can play a co-stimulatory or co-inhibitory role in cancer, depending on the binding receptor. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the relationship between HHLA2 levels and its impact on the prognosis of patients with solid cancers. The study used data from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (WOS), Cochrane and SCOPUS databases. The R studio software was used for the data analysis. The study assessed overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) by pooling appropriate hazard ratios (HR). Eighteen studies (2880 patients' data) were included. High expression of HHLA2 was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.23-2.03), shorter RFS (HR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.38-2.77) and worse DFS (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.01-2.09) in patients with solid cancers. The current study suggests that high expression of HHLA2 is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with solid cancers.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Disease-Free Survival , Immunoglobulins
5.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(5): 604-609, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720224

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the associated risk factors for isolated liver metastasis in breast cancer patients and to detect the prognostic factors related to survival. STUDY DESIGN: Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, The University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkiye, from January 2011 to November 2020. METHODOLOGY: Patients with breast cancer liver metastasis who experienced surgery were retrospectively analysed for breast cancer and metastases-related characteristics. Descriptive statistical methods were used in the evaluation of data. Survival analyses were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank and univariable Cox regression tests were utilised to search for prognostic factors' impact on survival. RESULTS: Out of 12 patients, 11 had recurrent disease after a median of 36 months of disease-free survival (DFS) and one patient had de novo metastasis. Grade 3 tumours and increased expression of Ki-67 had a negative effect on DFS. The median follow-up period was 66 months. Survival analysis showed 2- and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival rates were 82%, 69%, 92%, and 82%, respectively. Development of liver metastasis in 3 years following breast cancer treatment was linked to worse PFS (p = 0.040). CONCLUSION:  Long-term survival is possible for breast cancer survivors with liver metastasis. Disease-free interval is an important determinant. Longer progression-free survival was detected in patients who had developed metastasis after three years of breast cancer treatment. KEY WORDS: Breast cancer, Liver metastasis, Hepatic surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Risk Factors , Prognosis , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Survival Rate , Turkey/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
6.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713611

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer improves survival compared with just D2 lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Between September 2014 and June 2018, patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision gastrectomy. The modified intention-to-treat population was defined as patients who had pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (pT1 N1-3 M0 and pT2-4 N0-3 M0). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the recurrence pattern and overall survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up of patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (169 patients) and patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy +complete mesogastric excision group (169 patients) was 55 (interquartile range 37-60) months and 51 (interquartile range 40-60) months respectively. Recurrence occurred in 50 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (29.6%) versus 33 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (19.5%) (P = 0.032). The 3-year disease-free survival was 75.5% (95% c.i. 68.3% to 81.3%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.0% (95% c.i. 78.7% to 89.6%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.042). The HR for recurrence in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 0.99) by Cox regression (P = 0.045). The 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% c.i. 70.4% to 83.1%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.8% (95% c.i. 79.6% to 90.2%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.058). The HR for death in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 1.02) (P = 0.058). CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional D2 dissection, D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision is associated with better disease-free survival, but there is no statistically significant difference in overall survival. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01978444 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Gastrectomy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Survival Rate , Neoplasm Staging
7.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi ; 32(4): 332-339, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733188

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: 2054 cases with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0~B at the Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2006 to September 2020 were retrospectively collected. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years. The primary endpoint of overall survival and secondary endpoints (tumor-related survival, disease-free survival, and postoperative complications) of patients treated with ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for stratified survival rate analysis. Fine-and-Gray competing risk model was used to analyze overall survival. Results: A total of 5 503 HCC nodules [mean tumor diameter (2.6±1.6) cm] underwent 3 908 MWAs between January 2006 and September 2020, with a median follow-up time of 45.6 (24.0 -79.2) months.The technical effectiveness rate of 5 375 tumor nodules was 97.5%. The overall survival rates at 5, 10, and 15-years were 61.6%, 38.8%, and 27.0%, respectively. The tumor-specific survival rates were 67.1%, 47.2%, and 37.7%, respectively. The free tumor survival rates were 25.8%, 15.7%, and 9.9%, respectively. The incidence rate of severe complications was 2.8% (108/3 908). Further analysis showed that the technical effectiveness and survival rate over the passing three time periods from January 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-September 2020 were significantly increased, with P < 0.001, especially for liver cancer 3.1~5.0 cm (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Microwave ablation therapy is a safe and effective method for BCLC stage 0-B, with significantly enhanced technical efficacy and survival rate over time.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Microwaves , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Microwaves/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Disease-Free Survival , Catheter Ablation/methods , Female , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged
8.
Saudi Med J ; 45(5): 481-489, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734428

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical relevance and prognostic value of changes in the Naples prognostic score (NPS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR) among esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients. METHODS: We studied 232 locally advanced ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy retrospectively. Categorizing individuals into the elevated NPS group and the non-elevated NPS group based on the change in NPS after NACR (ΔNPS > 0 or ∆NPS ≤ 0), we examined and compared the clinicopathological characteristics, survival rates, and postoperative complications between these 2 groups (∆NPS = post-NACR NPS - pre-NACR NPS). RESULTS: Results: Out of the 232 patients enrolled, 105 exhibited elevated NPS levels, while 127 showed non-elevated NPS levels. Survival analyses indicated inferior overall survival (OS) (p=0.024) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p=0.047) in the elevated NPS cohort compared to the non-elevated NPS cohort. Subsequent cox regression analyses identified the post-NACR change in NPS as an independent prognostic indicator for RFS (p=0.029) and OS (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Elevated NPS post-NACR emerged as a significant indicator of worse prognosis for locally advanced ESCC patients who underwent NACR. This finding has great potential to be useful for recognizing high-risk ESCC patients who received NACR before undergoing esophagectomy and making individualized subsequent therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Esophagectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Female , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Survival Rate , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(5): 672-678, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704205

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The common hepatic artery lymph node (CHALN) represents a second-echelon node for tumors in the head of the pancreas. Although early studies suggested survival was comparable between the CHALN and remote metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), whether the lymph node is associated with adverse survival remains equivocal. Here, we examined a prospective cohort of patients calculating actual survival to better understand implications of this specific lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We studied 215 patients with pancreatic head PDAC, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomies at a single institution between 2010 and 2017, wherein the CHALNs were excised. We performed actual and actuarial overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) analyses, with subsequent univariate and multivariate analyses in node-positive patients. RESULTS: Of this cohort, 7.3% of patients had involvement of the CHALN, and all of them had metastatic spread to first-echelon nodes. Actual median survival of patients with no lymph node involvement was 49 months. In patients with any nodal involvement, the survival was no different when comparing the lymph node positive and negative (13 and 20 months, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses likewise attached no significance to the lymph node metastasis, while demonstrating worse survival with positive margin status and poorly differentiated histology. Our DFS analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in actual survival in node-positive patients regardless of the CHALN involvement and recommended against its assessment in prognosticating survival or guiding surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Hepatic Artery , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/secondary , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Disease-Free Survival , Survival Rate , Lymph Node Excision , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Prospective Studies
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10001, 2024 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693256

ABSTRACT

Interval breast cancers are diagnosed between scheduled screenings and differ in many respects from screening-detected cancers. Studies comparing the survival of patients with interval and screening-detected cancers have reported differing results. The aim of this study was to investigate the radiological and histopathological features and growth rates of screening-detected and interval breast cancers and subsequent survival. This retrospective study included 942 female patients aged 50-69 years with breast cancers treated and followed-up at Kuopio University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2016. The screening-detected and interval cancers were classified as true, minimal-signs, missed, or occult. The radiological features were assessed on mammograms by one of two specialist breast radiologists with over 15 years of experience. A χ2 test was used to examine the association between radiological and pathological variables; an unpaired t test was used to compare the growth rates of missed and minimal-signs cancers; and the Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to examine survival after screening-detected and interval cancers. Sixty occult cancers were excluded, so a total of 882 women (mean age 60.4 ± 5.5 years) were included, in whom 581 had screening-detected cancers and 301 interval cancers. Disease-specific survival, overall survival and disease-free survival were all worse after interval cancer than after screening-detected cancer (p < 0.001), with a mean follow-up period of 8.2 years. There were no statistically significant differences in survival between the subgroups of screening-detected or interval cancers. Missed interval cancers had faster growth rates (0.47% ± 0.77%/day) than missed screening-detected cancers (0.21% ± 0.11%/day). Most cancers (77.2%) occurred in low-density breasts (< 25%). The most common lesion types were masses (73.9%) and calcifications (13.4%), whereas distortions (1.8%) and asymmetries (1.7%) were the least common. Survival was worse after interval cancers than after screening-detected cancers, attributed to their more-aggressive histopathological characteristics, more nodal and distant metastases, and faster growth rates.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Mammography , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Aged , Mammography/methods , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Finland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Mass Screening/methods , Disease-Free Survival
11.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13761, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693705

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In order to improve survival outcomes in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), strategies for neoadjuvant therapy need to be revisited. We evaluated and compared the efficacy of different neoadjuvant therapeutic modalities in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with clinical stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC was included. All the patients underwent surgical resection after one to four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment consisting of chemotherapy (83), immunotherapy (23), and immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (152). RESULTS: The radiologic response rate in the combined immunochemotherapy group was 67.8%, higher than that of 48.2% in the chemotherapy group and 4.3% in the immunotherapy group (p < 0.001). An improved major pathological response (MPR) was also achieved in the combined therapy group compared with the chemotherapy group and the immunotherapy group (53.9% vs. 10.8% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.001). Patients in the combined therapy group had a significant trend toward longer disease-free survival than those in the chemotherapy alone group (3-year disease-free survival [DFS] of 68.79% vs. 50.81%; hazard ratio [HR] for progression or death, 0.477; p = 0.003). Multivariate Cox analysis identified radical surgery (HR, 0.328; p = 0.033), ypN0-1 stage (HR, 0.591; p = 0.038) and MPR result (HR, 0.362; p = 0.007) to be independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant treatment with a combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy appears to achieve higher radiological and pathological responses than monotherapy for IIA-IIIB NSCLC. Log-rank analysis showed that a better outcome could be expected in patients with the addition of immunotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy if compared with patients with chemotherapy alone in terms of DFS.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Immunotherapy , Lung Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Male , Female , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Aged , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Pneumonectomy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
12.
Biometrics ; 80(2)2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708764

ABSTRACT

When studying the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes, it is common that some individuals never experience failure events, which suggests that they have been cured. However, the cure status may not be observed due to censoring which makes it challenging to define treatment effects. Current methods mainly focus on estimating model parameters in various cure models, ultimately leading to a lack of causal interpretations. To address this issue, we propose 2 causal estimands, the timewise risk difference and mean survival time difference, in the always-uncured based on principal stratification as a complement to the treatment effect on cure rates. These estimands allow us to study the treatment effects on failure times in the always-uncured subpopulation. We show the identifiability using a substitutional variable for the potential cure status under ignorable treatment assignment mechanism, these 2 estimands are identifiable. We also provide estimation methods using mixture cure models. We applied our approach to an observational study that compared the leukemia-free survival rates of different transplantation types to cure acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Our proposed approach yielded insightful results that can be used to inform future treatment decisions.


Subject(s)
Models, Statistical , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma , Humans , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/mortality , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Causality , Biometry/methods , Treatment Outcome , Computer Simulation , Disease-Free Survival , Survival Analysis
13.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 140, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720305

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We investigated the real-world efficacy of adjuvant therapy for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with pathological high-risk factors. METHODS: Study participants were enrolled from November 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. Clinical bias was balanced by propensity score matching. Disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify survival-associated factors. p ≤ 0.05 was the threshold for statistical significance. RESULTS: A total of 454 patients, among whom 134 (29.5%) underwent adjuvant therapy, were enrolled in this study. One hundred and eighteen of the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy were well matched with non-treatment patients. Prognostic outcomes of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the non-treatment group, as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis after PSM. Differences in prevention of recurrence or metastasis between the targeted therapy and chemotherapy groups were insignificant. Adjuvant therapy was found to be positive prognostic factors, tumor size and solid growth patterns were negative. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy significantly improved the DFS for stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with high-risk factors. Larger prospective clinical trials should be performed to verify our findings.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Male , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/surgery , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/therapy , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/mortality , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Risk Factors , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Pneumonectomy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Prognosis , Kaplan-Meier Estimate
14.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13766, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognosis of invasive lung adenocarcinoma that manifests as pure ground glass nodules (pGGNs) and confirm the effectiveness of sublobectomy and lymph node sampling in patients with pGGN-featured invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients with pGGN-featured IAC, who underwent complete resection in two medical institutions between January 2011 and May 2022. Stratification analysis was conducted to ensure balanced baseline characteristics among the patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared between the groups using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. RESULTS: The 5-year OS and DFS rates for patients with IAC presenting as pGGNs after surgery were 96.5% and 100%, respectively. No lymph node metastasis or recurrence was observed in any of the enrolled patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year OS between patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobectomy, along with lymph node resection or sampling. CONCLUSION: IAC presented as pGGNs exhibited low-grade malignancy and had a relatively good prognosis. Therefore, these patients may be treated with sublobectomy and lymph node sampling.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Pneumonectomy , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/surgery , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/mortality , Aged , Prognosis , Pneumonectomy/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Survival Rate/trends , Disease-Free Survival , Adult
15.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303494, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771764

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify the predictive role of sarcopenia in long-term survival among rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery based on available evidence. METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched up to October 20, 2023, for relevant studies. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were the endpoints. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 4283 patients were included. The pooled results demonstrated that preoperative sarcopenia significantly predicted poorer OS (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.67-2.57, P<0.001), DFS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.39-2.48, P<0.001) and CSS (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.31-2.56, P<0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on neoadjuvant therapy indicated that sarcopenia was a risk factor for worse OS and DFS in patients who received (OS: HR = 2.44, P<0.001; DFS: HR = 2.16, P<0.001) but not in those who did not receive (OS: HR = 2.44, P<0.001; DDFS: HR = 1.86, P = 0.002) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In addition, subgroup analysis based on sample size and ethnicity showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Preoperative sarcopenia is significantly related to poor survival in surgical rectal cancer patients and could serve as a novel and valuable predictor of long-term prognosis in these patients.


Subject(s)
Rectal Neoplasms , Sarcopenia , Sarcopenia/mortality , Sarcopenia/complications , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Disease-Free Survival , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Preoperative Period , Risk Factors
16.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 159-164, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782386

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes of ampullary adenocarcinoma in a large patient group due to limited data on survival and risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the clinical and pathological findings and the survival of 184 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who underwent curative operation between 2007 and 2018 was performed. RESULTS: Pancreatobiliary subtype had a higher prevalence of jaundice before operation than the intestinal subtype (p < 0.05). Pancreatobiliary subtype had a larger tumor size (> 2 mm) (p < 0.01) and poorer differentiation (p < 0.05) than the intestinal subtype. Perineural invasion more frequently occurred in pancreatobiliary subtype than the intestinal subtype (p < 0.01) and pancreatobiliary subtype had a higher prevalence of positive dissected lymph nodes (p < 0.05) with an advanced disease stage (p < 0.01) than the intestinal subtype. Patients of the pancreatobiliary subtype had poorer disease-free and overall survival than patients of the intestinal subtype. No survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was found in either patients of the intestinal subtype or pancreatobiliary subtype. No significant difference was found in any subtypes regarding the recurrent regions. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatobiliary subtype exhibited a higher recurrence rate and a poorer overall survival rate with more unfavorable pathological characteristics than the intestinal subtype.


OBJETIVOS: Los datos sobre la supervivencia y los factores de riesgo del adenocarcinoma ampular son limitados debido a su rareza. Este estudio buscó comparar el subtipo intestinal y el subtipo pancreático-biliar en pacientes con adenocarcinoma ampular. MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de hallazgos clínicos y patológicos y la supervivencia de 184 pacientes con adenocarcinoma ampular tratados entre 2007 y 2018. RESULTADOS: El subtipo pancreático-biliar tuvo una mayor prevalencia de ictericia antes de la operación y un tamaño de tumor mayor, y una peor diferenciación, que el subtipo intestinal. La invasión perineural fue más frecuente en el subtipo pancreático-biliar, con una mayor prevalencia de linfonodos disecados positivos y un estadio avanzado de la enfermedad. Los pacientes del subtipo pancreático-biliar tuvieron una supervivencia libre de enfermedad y una supervivencia general peores que los pacientes del subtipo intestinal. No se encontró ningún beneficio de la quimioterapia adyuvante en pacientes del subtipo intestinal o pancreático-biliar. No hubo diferencia significativa en las regiones recurrentes. CONCLUSIÓN: El subtipo pancreático-biliar mostró una tasa de recurrencia y una tasa de supervivencia general peores, con características patológicas más desfavorables que el subtipo intestinal.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Ampulla of Vater , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Ampulla of Vater/pathology , Male , Female , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/classification , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/pathology , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/surgery , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Common Bile Duct Neoplasms/classification , Middle Aged , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Adult , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Aged, 80 and over , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Lymphatic Metastasis , Tumor Burden , Disease-Free Survival
17.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11761, 2024 05 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783028

ABSTRACT

Previously, we found that patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-low breast cancer are resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and have worse outcomes than those who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis and influencing factors in these patients. A total of 618 patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received standard thrice-weekly NACT were enrolled, including 411 patients with ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer. Data on the clinicopathological features of these patients before and after NACT were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the independent factors affecting 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Among the ER-positive, HER2-low patients, 49 (11.9%) achieved a pCR after NACT. A significant difference in survival was observed between patients with and without residual disease after NACT. Additionally, changes in immunohistochemical markers and tumor stages before and after NACT were found to be significant. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, cN_stage (P = 0.002), ER (P = 0.002) and Ki67 (P = 0.023) expression before NACT were significantly associated with 5-year DFS, while pT_stage (P = 0.015), pN_stage (P = 0.029), ER (P = 0.020) and Ki67 (P < 0.001) levels after NACT were related to 5-year DFS in ER-positive, HER2-low patients with residual disease. Our study suggested that high proliferation, low ER expression and advanced stage before and after NACT are associated with a poor prognosis, providing useful information for developing long-term treatment strategies for ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer in patients with residual disease in the future.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm, Residual , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Receptors, Estrogen , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Middle Aged , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Disease-Free Survival
18.
Int Braz J Urol ; 50(4): 415-432, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701185

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are considered standard treatments for stage II seminoma patients; however, these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Recently, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has emerged as an alternative strategy, and the first three phase II trials were published in 2023 with promising results. The present study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this surgery as an alternative treatment for stage IIA/B seminoma patients. PURPOSE: Seminomas are the most common testicular tumors, often affecting young adult males. Standard treatments for stage II seminomas include chemotherapy and radiation therapy, but these therapies are associated with long-term toxicities. Thus, identifying alternative strategies is paramount. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for treating this condition. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies evaluating RPLND as a primary treatment for stage II A/B seminomas. Using a random-effects model, single proportion and means and pooled 2-year recurrence-free survival rates with hazard rates and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, comprising 331 males with stage II seminomas. In the pooled analysis, the recurrence rate was 17.69% (95% CI 12.31-24.75), and the 2-year RFS rate was 81% (95% CI 0.77-0.86). The complication rate was 9.16% (95% CI 6.16-13.42), the Clavien-Dindo > 2 complication rate was 8.83% (95% CI 5.76-13.31), and the retrograde ejaculation rate was 7.01% (95% CI 3.54-13.40). The median operative time was 174.68 min (95% CI 122.17-249.76 min), median blood loss was 105.91 mL (95% CI 46.89-239.22 mL), and patients with no evidence of lymph node involvement ranged from 0-16%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary RPLNDs for treating stage IIA/B seminomas have favorable RFS rates, with low complication and recurrence rates. These findings provide evidence that this surgery is a viable alternative therapy for these patients.


Subject(s)
Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasm Staging , Seminoma , Testicular Neoplasms , Humans , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Seminoma/surgery , Seminoma/pathology , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Retroperitoneal Space , Treatment Outcome , Disease-Free Survival
19.
J Radiat Res ; 65(3): 337-349, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718391

ABSTRACT

Lymphocytes, which are highly sensitive to radiation, play a crucial role in the body's defense against tumors. Radiation-induced lymphopenia has been associated with poorer outcomes in different cancer types. Despite being the largest secondary lymphoid organ, the spleen has not been officially designated as an organ at risk. This study hypothesizes a connection between spleen irradiation and lymphopenia and seeks to establish evidence-based dosage limits for the spleen. We retrospectively analyzed data from 96 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between May 2010 and May 2017. Complete blood counts were collected before, during and after CRT. We established a model for predicting the minimum absolute lymphocyte count (Min ALC) and to investigate potential associations between spleen dosimetric variables and Min ALC. The median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 65.2% and 56.8%, respectively. The median values of pre-treatment ALC, Min ALC and post-treatment ALC were 1.40 × 109, 0.23 × 109 and 0.28 × 109/L, respectively. Regression analysis confirmed that the primary tumor location, number of fractions and spleen V5 were significant predictors of Min ALC during radiation therapy. Changes in ALC (ΔALC) were identified as an independent predictor of both OS and DFS. Spleen V5 is an independent predictor for Min ALC, and the maximum dose of the spleen is associated with an increased risk of severe lymphopenia. Therefore, these doses should be restricted in clinical practice. Additionally, ΔALC can serve as a prognostic indicator for adjuvant radiotherapy in gastric cancer.


Subject(s)
Lymphopenia , Spleen , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Lymphopenia/etiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Spleen/radiation effects , Spleen/pathology , Aged , Stomach Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Lymphocyte Count , Disease-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , Chemoradiotherapy , Radiotherapy Dosage , Aged, 80 and over
20.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 590, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic factor for parotid gland cancer (PGC). This study aimed to analyze the impact of extranodal extension (ENE) of intraparotid LN and LN metastasis burden on survival in PGC. METHODS: Patients with surgically treated PGC and at least one metastatic cervical LN were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome variables were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of ENE and LN metastasis burden was assessed using the Cox model. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were included. ENE in cervical or intraparotid LN was not associated with DMFS, DSS, or OS. Intraparotid LN metastasis had a significant impact on prognosis, and the presence of only one metastatic intraparotid LN offered an approximately 1.5-fold risk of distant metastasis. Prognostic models based on the number of positive LNs (1 vs. 2-3 vs. 4+) were superior to the AJCC N stage in terms of DMFS, DSS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: ENE of cervical or intraparotid LN has a limited effect on the prognosis of PGC, and the number of positive LNs is better than the AJCC N stage in LN status evaluation.


Subject(s)
Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Parotid Neoplasms , Humans , Parotid Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Aged , Prognosis , Adult , Extranodal Extension/pathology , Survival Rate , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Neck/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...